Posts ⁂ The Postmodern Terminal >_
Three traditions people use interchangeably and should not, read through the Doctrine of Discovery, Indigenous sovereignty, and what decolonization actually names.
Anticolonial, postcolonial, and decolonial get used as synonyms. They are not synonyms. I will argue that the three form a controlled vocabulary you are obliged to handle precisely. I make that case by separating what each tradition asks, then testing all three against the Doctrine of Discovery, where the stakes are land rather than metaphor. My mechanic has a controlled vocabulary too; I cannot call every engine part a catalytic converter. Use these terms and you owe the reader a footnote with your own definition and the scholars behind it.
Anticolonial theory is a tradition of resistance and liberation. Frantz Fanon, a Martinican psychiatrist who worked in Algeria during the revolution, showed in Black Skin, White Masks and The Wretched of the Earth how colonialism dehumanizes the colonizer along with the colonized. He showed too what it takes to reclaim a mind and a material existence. Aimé Césaire argued in Discourse on Colonialism that Europe carried abroad not civilization but a particular European barbarism, which came home as fascism.
Postcolonial theory emerged in literary and cultural studies in the 1970s and 1980s. It asks what legacies persist after independence. Edward Said's Orientalism (1978) is the foundational text: Western scholarship about the East was not neutral description but a discourse that produced the Orient as an object of knowledge and the West as its rational superior. Homi Bhabha gave us hybridity, a site of ambivalence and negotiation. Gayatri Spivak asked not only who speaks but who cannot be heard. Can the subaltern speak? Of course she can. The question is whether the dominator will listen.
Decolonial theory is more recent and more ambitious, associated with Walter Mignolo, Aníbal Quijano, and the modernity/coloniality program in Latin America. Modernity and coloniality are co-constituted; the categories modernity offers as universals (rationality, progress, knowledge) were built on the subordination of non-European worlds. Sylvia Wynter presses further: the Western overrepresentation of Man, one contingent vision of the human, passes as the human, at enormous cost to everyone outside it.
Anticolonial theory confronts an occupier; postcolonial theory reads the residue; decolonial theory goes after the categories.
Coloniality, distinct from colonialism as a historical period of occupation, names the power relations and knowledge hierarchies that outlast the empire. Fanon called it the colonization of the mind.
Decolonization at its most concrete means the return of land through repatriation or rematriation, and acknowledgment of the original free prior existence of Indigenous peoples and their sovereignty. Sovereignty as Indigenous nations use the word is not the sovereignty of Westphalia; Mignolo names the tension, and the post-Westphalian version is a form of coloniality that keeps writing Indigenous nations out. Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang insist that decolonization is not a metaphor: the term cannot be decoupled from material return. It is not only land, since it also requires decolonizing minds, knowledge systems, and institutions.
The Doctrine of Discovery is where theology became jurisprudence. Papal bulls of the fifteenth century justified seizing Indigenous lands, and that logic still sits inside property law. Residential and boarding schools, built on Richard Henry Pratt's model of "kill the Indian and save the man," were run by churches and states together into the 1990s. Good intentions do not insulate an institution from coloniality.
The story does not end there. Wynter's critique of Man is itself a critique of theological anthropology, and Paulo Freire wrote Pedagogy of the Oppressed while working for the World Council of Churches. James Cone's The Cross and the Lynching Tree refuses to separate the gospel from racialized violence, which makes it decolonial theology. Mark Charles and other Indigenous Christian scholars are the sharpest critics of how Christianity was weaponized, because they know the tradition well enough to tell the gospel from its colonial distortion.
Linda Tuhiwai Smith's Decolonizing Methodologies asks whether research carries colonial assumptions. Her imperatives (naming, centering, protecting, returning, sharing) are epistemological commitments: free, prior, and informed consent, no decisions about us without us, reciprocity, co-authorship.
Sit with the lament before reaching for solutions. Then ask who counts as a knower where you work, who is excluded from that recognition, and whose questions you started with. As Onondaga Nation Turtle Clan Faithkeeper Oren Lyons puts it:
If you're not at the table, you're on the menu.
The Postmodern Terminal >_